Today’s Solutions: November 03, 2026

Many food systems have a detrimental effect on the environment, especially when it comes to the cattle industry. Cheap meat does not reflect its true price when it comes to its negative cost to our planet. So how can we bring meat products up to their true cost without hurting the pockets of the everyday person?

This is where the government and markets could play a role. Here are four economist-backed solutions that could be reasonably implemented to lessen this environmental burden and bring the meat up to its actual price.

Invest in methane

Cattle are the biggest food contributor to climate change, releasing methane gas through their digestive process. If governments invested in reducing methane released from cattle through regenerative farming practices and alternative foods, they could make a huge impact. Multiple global companies are currently developing lab-grown meat and other tasty alternatives which pack in just as many nutrients but hugely reduce the environmental cost of a meal.

Regulate pollution

The U.S. is one of the largest economies in the world with few incentives to change food production practices to reduce pollution. Although it is difficult to find a solution that doesn’t hurt the pockets of everyday consumers or the farmers who are trying to make a living, governments should be working toward finding the answers.

Make subsidies greener

In the U.S., farmers receive around $10 billion and $20 billion in subsidies each year. To incentivize people to carry out greener framing practices, strings could be attached to these that require a certain level of involvement in pollution-mitigating practices.

Tax carbon

Beef production takes a huge environmental toll on our planet and the cheap price we see on the shelves does not reflect the true cost of the product. The money which is having to be put into solving the problems that cattle cause has to come from somewhere, so taxing polluting carbon could be a source of this fund.

To avoid this price increase hitting those the hardest in society which it shouldn’t – such as low-income households – a carbon tax straight to the source could be introduced. One system that could be implemented is a cap-and-trade system, where polluters purchase credits for emissions to avoid going over a government-mandated cap.

Solutions News Source Print this article
More of Today's Solutions

Maya Higa built a wildlife sanctuary on Twitch, funded by the people who watc...

This article is part of The Optimist Daily's Local Changemakers 2026 series, spotlighting changemakers 30 and under. Image alt text: Maya Higa at Alveus ...

Read More

Stanford scientists discovered bleached coral can heal through touch

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Two coral fragments fell over in a Stanford lab tank. When they touched, one healed the other. The ...

Read More

Study: Drinking the right amount of caffeine may lower diabetes risks

While too much caffeine from coffee may cause unpleasant side effects such as anxiety or insomnia, that doesn’t mean you should cut your caffeine ...

Read More

AI could identify chickens in distress and improve conditions

We’ve already written before about AI’s potential to improve pigs’ lives by listening to them. Now, scientists have found they can use AI on ...

Read More