Assessing the direct public health impact of power-plant emissions reduction provides further support to the climate change regulation to be introduced by President Obama this summer, judging by a new study published this week in the journal Nature Climate Change. Cutting carbon emissions from the power sector 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 would reduce co-pollutants emitted by coal-fired plants such as soot and ozone, reducing instances of children asthma and preventing premature deaths. We like to think these findings by researchers at Syracuse and Harvard Universities can help grow public support for Obama’s upcoming policy.
EPA climate rules would reduce air pollution, saving thousands of lives
More of Today's Solutions
Attention lazy gardeners! Why doing less can boost butterfly populations in y...
A recent scientific study published in the journal Science of the Total Environment demonstrates that a small change in lawn maintenance habits can have ...
Read MoreCoffee vs. tea: which caffeine source reigns supreme for health and vitality?
For many people, coffee is more than simply a morning habit; it's an integral component of their daily lives. But is this really the ...
Read MorePakistan’s Billion Tree project is bringing the bees and honey back
In 2018, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan announced the Billion Tree project, a lofty country-wide effort to plant 10 billion trees over a 5-year ...
Read More7 Reasons why your next vacation should be a road trip
In these uncertain times, your dream vacation to a tropical island or a bustling foreign city may have been put on hold—but that doesn’t ...
Read More
