For the past several years, social scientists have been deeply worried about the replicability of their findings. Incredibly influential, textbook findings in psychology — like the “ego depletion” theory of willpower, or the “marshmallow test” — have been bending or breaking under rigorous retests. And the scientists have learned that what they used to consider commonplace methodological practices were really just recipes to generate false positives. This period has been called the “replication crisis” by some. While this is certainly a red flag for science, there’s also a silver lining to the issue of replicability: by learning from failed replications, scientists learn to do better science.
Why it’s OK that scientists are failing to replicate social science studies
More of Today's Solutions
Why you should fill your cart with ugly watermelons
When it comes to picking produce at our local market or grocery store, many of us are… well… shallow. We tend to fill our ...
Read MoreWhy culturally diverse datasets are critical for training AI
In the constantly evolving field of artificial intelligence, the demand to embrace cultural diversity in training datasets is more than a suggestion; it is ...
Read MoreHow vertical farming transforms urban spaces and breathes new life into empty...
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM In cities across the globe, office vacancies are at an all-time high. In the United States alone, more ...
Read More4 easy ways to remove lint without a lint roller
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Lint happens—it’s just a fact of laundry life. Whether it’s pet hair on your favorite sweater or tiny ...
Read More
