For the past several years, social scientists have been deeply worried about the replicability of their findings. Incredibly influential, textbook findings in psychology — like the “ego depletion” theory of willpower, or the “marshmallow test” — have been bending or breaking under rigorous retests. And the scientists have learned that what they used to consider commonplace methodological practices were really just recipes to generate false positives. This period has been called the “replication crisis” by some. While this is certainly a red flag for science, there’s also a silver lining to the issue of replicability: by learning from failed replications, scientists learn to do better science.
Why it’s OK that scientists are failing to replicate social science studies
More of Today's Solutions
Minnesota just banned the apps that make deepfake nudes
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Two years ago, Molly Kelley found out that a close family friend had used a nudification website to ...
Read MoreThe 3 needs that science says matter more than success and achievement
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM There’s a particular kind of exhaustion that comes from doing everything right. The career is advancing, the goals ...
Read MoreConservation success: 2,000 captive Southern White Rhinos to be released acro...
Donovan Jooste, a passionate conservationist, witnessed a stunning spectacle in the South African grasslands: approximately 2,000 southern white rhinos congregating on a farm in ...
Read More3 so-called bad habits that might actually be making you a better person
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Let’s be honest. Most of us have habits we wish we could kick. Maybe it’s venting too much ...
Read More
