Today’s Solutions: March 30, 2026

Recently a row broke out over the international program director working for Greenpeace in Amsterdam who several times a month flew to visit his family in Luxembourg. After the issue was raised in the media Greenpeace issued a statement saying that the director would take the train from now on. The argument: Flying is bad for the environment and green activists should take the train.

But is flying so bad? Researchers from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute have discovered that flying, depending on trip specifications is better for the environment than driving. The study authors looked at data sets pertaining to passenger movement in the last 40 years. They concluded that flying is 57% better for the environment than driving. It should be noted however that taking the train is even better for the environment.

Solutions News Source Print this article
More of Today's Solutions

How Mexico’s conservation work brought monarchs back from the brink

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Every fall, tens of millions of monarch butterflies travel nearly 3,000 miles from Canada, through the United States, ...

Read More

The high school student whose filter uses magnetic oil to trap microplastics

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM The story starts with a newspaper article and a neighborhood that wasn't getting help. A few years ago, ...

Read More

Brown bear population in the Pyrenees makes a bear-y impressive comeback

Back in 1996, the addition of three bears from Slovenia launched a conservation plan to reintroduce the near-extinct brown bears in the Pyrenees. The ...

Read More

Why venting makes anger worse – and what actually helps

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM When anger flares up, many of us turn to venting—whether it is ranting to a friend, punching a ...

Read More