Today’s Solutions: January 18, 2022

Arizona’s state Supreme Court has announced a policy change to improve juror diversity and reduce racial bias in the legal system. The state will eliminate peremptory challenges, the practice that allows lawyers to remove jurors from a case without justification.

In both criminal and civil jury trials, the court assembles a panel of jurors larger than the number needed. Lawyers from both sides can remove jurors “for cause,” meaning they have a conflict of interest in the case such as being related to one of the parties involved. Additionally, in many states, lawyers are also granted peremptory challenges, in which they can remove jurors arbitrarily.

As reported by Vox, this practice leads to the disproportionate dismissal of jurors of color, and “multiple studies suggest that peremptory strikes play a major role in producing juries that are whiter than the population as a whole.”

Although Batson v. Kentucky (1986) set constitutional limits on peremptory challenges, determining that lawyers cannot remove a juror based on race, Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote a concurring opinion arguing that ending racial discrimination in jury selection would be far more feasible with the complete removal of peremptory challenges. His opinion was based on a study of prosecutions in Dallas which found that “the chance of a qualified black sitting on a jury was 1 in 10, compared to 1 in 2 for a white.”

In addition to these juror dismissals, other factors contribute to a lack of diversity on juries. One big factor is that racial minorities are less likely to appear on voter registration lists and vehicle registration lists, which are both used to send jury summons. Although some critics argue that the removal of peremptory challenges eliminates lawyers’ ability to remove jurors who legitimately appear to show signs of bias, evidence of dismissal of jurors based on long hair, style choice, and facial hair demonstrates that peremptory challenge rights are all too often abused to achieve a desired legal outcome.

Arizona will join the legal systems of Great Britain and Canada which abolished peremptory challenges in 1988 and 2019 respectively.

Solutions News Source Print this article
More of Today's Solutions

California pledges to build the world’s largest wildlife crossing

California has a rich array of wildlife, from seals to bears, there are a number of beautiful creatures to spot. Although, for centuries wolves have not been seen around the state where they used to ... Read More

Jigsaw Puzzles: A Hobby That’s Great for Your Brain

With the winter season well underway, our summertime lockdown outside activities has briefly been put on pause. So, we thought we’d give our readers some inspiration for a hobby you can carry out all from ... Read More

Samaritans pilot a project aimed at suicide prevention in UK

UK-based suicide prevention charity Samaritans has teamed up with Anglia Ruskin University (ARU) in Cambridge to create the nation’s first digital-only suicide prevention support program. The idea behind offering digital-only support is to accommodate the ... Read More

Edible coating keeps fresh produce from quickly spoiling

Removing plastic packaging from fruit and vegetables in supermarkets can help reduce a significant amount of plastic waste. However, if you have a product that tends to spoil rapidly once ripe, such as a banana, ... Read More

Everything you need to know about California’s new composting law

Food waste is a huge problem to tackle, which is why we’ve shared numerous stories with tips on how you can help reduce your own personal food waste. To that end, we’ve suggested that people ... Read More

Stay-for-Free initiative for homeless in Osaka reaches 10,000-guest milestone

Over two decades ago in Osaka’s Nishinari Ward, a group of hostel owners and some others decided to start a “Stay-for-Free” volunteer movement to help the masses of homeless day laborers. Just last month, the ... Read More