Today’s Solutions: October 19, 2021

Arizona’s state Supreme Court has announced a policy change to improve juror diversity and reduce racial bias in the legal system. The state will eliminate peremptory challenges, the practice that allows lawyers to remove jurors from a case without justification.

In both criminal and civil jury trials, the court assembles a panel of jurors larger than the number needed. Lawyers from both sides can remove jurors “for cause,” meaning they have a conflict of interest in the case such as being related to one of the parties involved. Additionally, in many states, lawyers are also granted peremptory challenges, in which they can remove jurors arbitrarily.

As reported by Vox, this practice leads to the disproportionate dismissal of jurors of color, and “multiple studies suggest that peremptory strikes play a major role in producing juries that are whiter than the population as a whole.”

Although Batson v. Kentucky (1986) set constitutional limits on peremptory challenges, determining that lawyers cannot remove a juror based on race, Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote a concurring opinion arguing that ending racial discrimination in jury selection would be far more feasible with the complete removal of peremptory challenges. His opinion was based on a study of prosecutions in Dallas which found that “the chance of a qualified black sitting on a jury was 1 in 10, compared to 1 in 2 for a white.”

In addition to these juror dismissals, other factors contribute to a lack of diversity on juries. One big factor is that racial minorities are less likely to appear on voter registration lists and vehicle registration lists, which are both used to send jury summons. Although some critics argue that the removal of peremptory challenges eliminates lawyers’ ability to remove jurors who legitimately appear to show signs of bias, evidence of dismissal of jurors based on long hair, style choice, and facial hair demonstrates that peremptory challenge rights are all too often abused to achieve a desired legal outcome.

Arizona will join the legal systems of Great Britain and Canada which abolished peremptory challenges in 1988 and 2019 respectively.

Solutions News Source Print this article
More of Today's Solutions

California opens its first solar-powered composting facility

Starting in 2022, most homes and businesses in California will be required to recycle all food and yard waste in their yard debris carts. The effort is part of new state regulation (SB 1383) which ... Read More

Internet sleuth solves decades-long guitar mystery

Canadian rock star Randy Bachman was devastated when his 1957 Gretsch 6120 Chet Atkins guitar was stolen from his hotel room in 1976, but thanks to a dedicated internet sleuth, the guitar has been returned ... Read More

Mustard plant could be the solution to greener aviation fuel

Aviation accounts for about three percent of all global emissions, but coming up with more sustainable fuel sources would significantly gut down on the industry’s footprint. Researchers from the University of Georgia think they have ... Read More

WHO recognizes Henrietta Lacks for her life-changing contributions to medicine

When Henrietta Lacks sought treatment for cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore in the 1950s, her cancer cells were harvested without her consent. These “HeLa cells” became the first sample of human cells ... Read More

Indian student designs safe and sustainable solar ironing cart

It’s not uncommon to see ironing vendor carts in the streets of Indian cities. These carts offer quick and affordable ironing services, but their irons are often powered by charcoal, creating air pollution issues. To ... Read More

This bandage quickly identifies the severity of a burn

We recently wrote about a bandage design that indicates potential infection. Now, there’s another smart bandage design in the works. This one, literally called SMART, aims to help first responders evaluate and treat severe burns ... Read More