Policymakers around the world are working out the logistics for the next climate change agreement. Given the international political disparity a binding agreement may be out of reach. But that doesn’t have to be a bad thing. Non-binding climate agreements, like the Kyoto Protocol, have turned out to be most effective in limiting global climate emissions. On average countries reduced emissions more than they initially agreed to. There are two reasons why non-binding agreements work. First, the more binding an agreement is, the less likely a country is to sign it. Secondly, no agreement is that binding, aside from sanctions or going to war there is no other recourse for countries that break binding agreements. Sometimes it is better to leave big decisions like reducing greenhouse gas emissions to individual countries, and let them make the right call on their own.
Non-binding climate agreements work best
More of Today's Solutions
Why the poo taboo has held back a killer disease, and what’s changing
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM There is a disease that kills more than one million people a year, nearly half of them children ...
Read MoreRage workouts don’t calm you down, research finds. Here’s what does.
BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Slamming tires with a sledgehammer, pummeling a punching bag, running yourself into the ground when you're furious: the ...
Read MoreEating these 5 “sirtfoods” can support healthy aging
We recently published a story about how eating bitter melon can improve longevity. Remaining within the topic of healthy aging, today we bring you ...
Read More4 things that keep Canadian traffic fatalities lower than the US
While traffic-related fatalities increased in the United States by 19 percent between 2010 and 2020, Canadian rates declined by about the same amount in ...
Read More
