BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM
In a landmark move bringing Italy in step with many of its European peers, the Constitutional Court has ruled that both women in a same-sex couple who conceive a child abroad via medically assisted reproduction (MAR) must be legally recognized as parents. This decision marks a significant stride toward legal parity and stability for rainbow families across the country.
The ruling came in response to a case involving a couple from Lucca, Tuscany who are identified only as GG and IP. The couple conceived their child through in vitro fertilization (IVF) in another country. Although the two women jointly planned and parented the child, only the birth mother was legally recognized in Italy. This legal gap left the non-biological mother without parental rights and the child without guaranteed protection of both parent relationships.
The Court, led by President Giovanni Amoroso, found this legal approach to be unconstitutional. In its May 22 decision, the Court affirmed that excluding the non-biological mother violates key principles of equality, family life, and legal certainty. It emphasized that the child’s right to continuous and stable relationships with both parents outweighs bureaucratic hurdles. As a result, both mothers must now be listed on the birth certificate without requiring the non-biological mother to undergo stepchild adoption.
Restoring dignity to rainbow families
LGBTQ+ advocates have welcomed the ruling as a breakthrough. “This is a monumental decision,” said Marilena Grassadonia of Famiglie Arcobaleno, a leading LGBTQ+ rights group in Italy. “It restores dignity and protection to rainbow families who have long been marginalised and discriminated against in our legal system.”
Legal groups echoed this sentiment. Vincenzo Miri, president of Rete Lenford and legal counsel to the couple, described it as a “historic decision, obtained after years of legal battles” aimed at reversing the precedent set by the Supreme Court.
Progress, but persistent gaps remain
While civil unions for same-sex couples have been legal since 2016, Italy has lagged behind much of Western Europe on broader LGBTQ+ rights. Same-sex couples still cannot marry or adopt jointly in most situations, and access to IVF and other reproductive technologies remains limited to heterosexual couples.
In a separate but related ruling issued the same week, the Constitutional Court upheld these restrictions, noting that it is Parliament’s responsibility to make legislative changes. Critics argue that such laws reflect outdated notions of family and fail to reflect the diversity of today’s households.
Conservative groups have been quick to denounce the May 22 decision. The anti-LGBTQ+ group Pro Vita e Famiglia labeled it an “existential lie,” insisting that “no one is the child of two mothers.” Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s right-wing government has yet to release an official statement, although some coalition members have criticized the decision as an overreach by the judiciary.
Italy joins European peers—at last
With this ruling, Italy joins countries such as the UK, France, Spain, and the Netherlands in recognizing both mothers in same-sex parenting arrangements. Even Germany, which has traditionally shared Italy’s cautious stance on social issues, passed reforms in 2021 to grant automatic recognition to non-biological mothers in marriages involving MAR.
However, in Eastern Europe, many EU countries like Hungary, Poland, and Romania continue to deny any legal recognition of same-sex parental rights. These cross-border inconsistencies complicate travel and relocation for LGBTQ+ families, whose rights may evaporate when crossing into less progressive jurisdictions. The European Parliament called for greater harmonization of family laws across member states in a 2022 resolution.
Legal clarity, but more reform needed
Although this judgment is a step forward, legal gaps remain. The Court’s decision currently applies only to children conceived abroad via MAR. Within Italy, same-sex female couples remain barred from accessing IVF, meaning the issue of non-biological parental recognition for children born domestically is unresolved.
Until Italian law is updated, many families will still face lengthy and uncertain adoption processes to secure legal ties between parents and children. “The Court has done what it can within the limits of the Constitution,” said Grassadonia. “Now it’s Parliament’s turn to act decisively.”
As Italy reckons with the evolving definition of family, this ruling represents a powerful affirmation of equality and a challenge to lawmakers to ensure that all families, regardless of how they are formed, are given equal protection under the law.
